The CEO COO relationship
- Andrew Visser
- 5 days ago
- 3 min read
A COO Should Not Be a Counterweight
A COO does not exist to balance out a CEO or founder.
That idea sounds appealing, but in practice it is often the beginning of a bad relationship.
A counterweight assumes the founder is the problem. Too fast. Too scattered. Too much. So the answer becomes simple: hire someone to slow things down, smooth the edges, and keep them in check.
That is not what a COO is for.
And it is certainly not what a Fractional COO is for.
If that is the role you want, you are probably not looking for operational leadership. You are looking for someone to manage the founder. That may sound sensible, but it usually means you have hired an expensive babysitter. In many cases, a Chief of Staff would be a better fit.
What a Founder Does
The founder sets direction.
They define the vision, make the big calls, and push the business forward. That is where their value lies. Founders are often strongest at seeing opportunity before everyone else does, and at moving quickly enough to act on it.
But speed creates its own problems.
Ideas multiply. Priorities blur. Decisions stack up. And without a strong operating model, the founder becomes the point through which everything has to pass.
That is when the business starts to depend too heavily on one person’s energy, judgement, and availability.
What a COO Actually Does
A COO makes the direction real.
That means translating ambition into execution. It means taking five half-formed ideas, turning three into systems, parking one, and telling the founder the fifth is a bad idea.
It also means creating the structure that allows the business to function without constant founder involvement. The right COO does not just keep things organised. They build the operating rhythm, sharpen priorities, improve decision-making, and make sure the team can deliver consistently.
A good Fractional COO does this without needing to be in the business full-time. They bring senior operational leadership where it is needed most, helping the company move from reactive to intentional.
Why Balance Is the Wrong Goal
The word balance sounds attractive, but it is the wrong image.
Balance suggests two forces cancelling each other out. That is not what a leadership team needs. You do not want your two most senior people neutralising each other.
You want alignment.
You want a founder who is driving the business forward, and a COO who ensures the business can actually keep up. That means creating enough challenge to improve the quality of thinking, without turning every discussion into a negotiation over control.
The best COO relationships are not built on tension for its own sake. They are built on trust, clarity, and a shared understanding of what the business needs next.
The Real Value of a Fractional COO
This is where a Fractional COO becomes especially valuable.
For many growing businesses, the need is real, but not constant enough to justify a full-time hire. The company may need stronger systems, better process, clearer accountability, or help with a major change, but not a permanent executive salary.
That is exactly where fractional support makes sense.
A Fractional COO helps founders stop being the system. They create leverage, reduce operational drag, and free up the leadership team to focus on the work that only they can do. Done well, this does not slow the business down. It gives the business the capacity to grow without becoming more chaotic.
Hire for leverage
If you hire someone to balance you, you will probably spend more time negotiating with them than benefiting from them.
If you hire someone to build the system, you stop having to carry the system yourself.
That is the difference.
A COO is not there to cancel out the founder. They are there to make the business stronger, steadier, and more scalable.
If your business needs operational leadership that creates leverage rather than friction, let’s talk.

Comments